|
Implications of Medical
Tourism
|
Since time immemorial, tourism
has played a very significant role. It has promoted
cultural as well as economic ties among various
countries and nations of the world. Besides, the
accounts left by tourists have been an important source
of historiography. From the economic point of view, its
role has been tremendous and has gone on expanding with
the development of better and swifter means of transport
and communications. Instead
of exporting goods to other countries, one brings buyers
in the guise of tourists. Thus the country promoting
tourism earns large amounts of foreign exchange by
selling goods and services to them. Countries have been
vying with one another in attracting foreign tourists by
offering them all possible kinds of incentives such as
comfortable hotel accommodation, good food, luxury bus
and train transportation, places of historical and
cultural importance to visit, clean beaches and so on.
|
Over the years, various kinds of tourism,
ranging from eco-tourism and heritage tourism to agro-tourism,
have come into existence. The latest addition is medical
tourism. India has been hoping to earn billions of dollars in
foreign exchange from this source as restrictions of travel are
eased as globalisation gathers momentum.
A person in the United States has to spend an enormous sum on
medical treatment or surgery. If he comes to India for the same
kind of treatment, his benefits are three-fold. He gets the same
kind of treatment at a much cheaper rate, he visits places of
tourist interest and saves quite a significant sum of money.
Thus he gets treatment, sightseeing and savings. Besides, in top
private hospitals in India risks of death are lower. According
to Dr. Naresh Trehan, the death rate for coronary bypass
patients at Escorts is 0.8 per cent while it is three times more
at New York-Presbyterian Hospital, where Bill Clinton recently
received treatment for his heart ailment.
To illustrate this, let us refer to a typical example, recently
cited by The Washington Post: “Three months ago, Howard Staab
learned that he suffered from a life-threatening heart condition
and would have to undergo surgery at a cost of up to $200,000—an
impossible sum for the 53-year-old carpenter from Durham, N.C.,
who has no health insurance.
“So he outsourced the job to India.
“Taking his cue from cost-cutting U.S. businesses, Staab… flew
about 7,500 miles to the Indian capital, where doctors at the
Escorts Heart Institute & Research Centre…replaced his balky
heart valve with one harvested from a pig. Total bill: about
$10,000, including round-trip airfare and a planned side trip to
the Taj Mahal.”
Here, people like Staab, coming as medical tourists, get First
World treatment and nursing at Third World prices. The
differences in cost may be indicated by citing just two
examples. Heart surgery in America costs $30,000 while it costs
just $6,000 in India. Bone marrow transplants cost $250,000 in
USA as against $26,000 here.
Moreover, they seldom face any kind of hassle or discourteous
behaviour from the staff. Tour operators properly plan
everything after eliciting medical specialists’ considered
opinion on the proposed line of treatment. English language,
highly qualified doctors, trained nursing staff and a large
variety of tourism options make India more attractive than other
countries in the developing world. Quite a large number of
doctors, technicians and nurses have the experience of working
in the West. A significant number of medical tourists are
non-resident Indians who feel homely here.
A number of government and private hospitals in India have
joined hands to promote medical tourism. Prominent among them
are AIIMS, Apollo Hospitals, B.M.Birla Heart Research Centre,
Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tata Memorial Hospital,
Mumbai, Apollo Cancer Hospital, Chennai, Indraprastha Medical
Corporation, Delhi, and Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases,
Chennai.
Besides appropriate allopathic treatment, rejuvenation through
yoga and ayurvedic massage, a la Kerala style, is also offered
to prospective takers. Arrangements are already in place to pick
up medical tourists from airports and lodge them in luxury rooms
of hospitals, having all the modern amenities like the Internet,
television, fridge, air conditioner, telephone, etc.
Maharashtra is the first among Indian States to form Medical
Tourism Corporation of Maharashtra (MTCM) in collaboration with
FICCI to attract medical tourists from rich countries. The
830-bed Wockhard Hospital in Mumbai is due to the initiative of
the MTCM. A director of the FICCI, one of the promoters of MTCM,
hopes that India has the potential of becoming medical tourism
capital of the world.
The CII (Confederation of Indian Industries) had commissioned
McKinsey to prepare a study on the potential of medical tourism
in the country. The study points out that India has potential to
attract a million medical tourists every year (last year an
estimated 150,000 foreigners came to India for medical treatment
and this number is increasing by about 15 per cent annually) and
its earnings could go up to $5billion. To exploit the potential
the government and the corporate sector need to join their
efforts. Hospitals and their medical and paramedical staff and
tour operators need to be properly trained so that they handle
the growing number of foreign tourists with care and courtesy.
The study says, medical tourism may contribute Rs 5,000 to Rs
10,000 crore as revenue by 2012. The Economic Times (October 3,
2004) thinks, medical tourism business, growing at 30 per cent
annually, “has the potential to generate as much business as
software exports, if not more.”
Now the question to be considered is: how will growing medical
tourism affect people at large in India? The protagonists assert
that it will bring huge foreign exchange resources to the
country that will accelerate country’s economic growth. More
jobs will be created and this will benefit people at large. A
high up in the FICCI contends that the earnings from medical
tourism will trickle down to health care infrastructure and
services in rural areas, where more than 65 per cent of the
people live. With the growth of medical tourism, infrastructure
will expand. As the WHO estimates India will add at least 80,000
hospital beds annually for the coming five years. The level of
doctors, technicians and nurses will go up. Hospitals will be
able to provide themselves with latest machines and equipment.
It is contended that all this will benefit common people of the
country. They will not face difficulties in securing proper
treatment and hospitalisation facilities.
The people, however, are sceptical. Their experiences point out
that better hospitals in the government sector are available
mostly to those who have some kind of influence, be it
political, social or financial. The private sector hospitals and
nursing homes that have got land and other infrastructural
facilities at concessional rates from the government do not
really take care of the needs of the weaker sections of the
society. They have been perpetrating a fraud by setting apart
some beds for the poor only on paper. In a country where malaria
and TB are yet to be eradicated there does not seem much point
in promoting medical tourism and alluring best talents in profit
hungry hospitals. The nation spends huge amounts of money on
preparing doctors and, after, they graduate they will surely
migrate to them. At present there are hardly 4 qualified doctors
per 10,000 population. If one looks at the situation in rural
areas, the situation is quite deplorable as doctors do not want
to go because of the lack of infrastructure and the amenities
for their decent living. The country spends only around 5 per
cent of GDP on health care. The country has a very high infant
mortality rate.
Lastly, in the years to come, when medical tourism business
flourishes, there is bound to be a boost to racketeering in
human organs and the poor and the ignorant will be deprived of
their organs by unscrupulous and greedy doctors and hospitals
for the benefit of the rich.
It is high time that the pros and cons of medical tourism are
debated in parliament as well as in other public forums.
|